How to read these recommendations
Every entry above is an aggregate, not a single opinion. A stock only climbs this ranking when several channels make a qualified call on it — a named ticker, a clear buy/sell/watch stance, and actual reasoning in the video. One enthusiastic thumbnail does nothing; three independent analysts arguing the same direction within a few weeks moves the score. That is the entire point: single YouTube videos are entertainment, but the overlap between many of them is information.
The score next to each stock measures how strong and how fresh that agreement is. Calls lose half their weight every 30 days, so the list naturally rotates toward what creators are talking about now — yesterday's call counts roughly four times as much as one from two months ago. The Strong Buy badge is stricter than the score: it requires at least three distinct channels on the buy side and not a single seller. The full math is on our methodology page.
What to keep in mind
A strong consensus is a signal about attention and conviction, not a guarantee of returns. Finance YouTube herds: when one large channel covers a stock, others follow within days, which can inflate agreement around an already-crowded trade. That is why each creator's profile shows a measured accuracy and a performance line against the S&P 500 — check who is actually right before weighting their voice. We track these calls, we do not endorse them; nothing here is financial advice. For the freshest individual calls behind each rank, open the Terminal or the live call feed.
A practical workflow: start with the ranking above, then open the stock page of anything that surprises you. There you will find every individual call with its date, conviction and a link to the exact video — plus the dissenters. The disagreements are usually worth more than the agreement: when ten channels are buying and two specific ones are selling, reading why those two object teaches you the bear case faster than any screener. Then check the dissenters' profiles to see whether their skepticism has historically been right.